Well, here we go again about yet another high profile sex scandal. This time, the culprit is John Edwards, the former senator from North Carolina and some washed up, trashy looking bitch. I must say this for the record, I would never knowingly screw someone else’s husband. There are way too many available men on the market that I could have right at my fingertips and for that reason, I wouldn’t take that route.
Here is a married man alert, so men, please pay attention. If a woman says that she is comfortable committing adultery with you because the sex is so amazingly good, and she really doesn’t need a man in her life other than for a good time, don’t buy into it.
Edwards was looking for a temporary distraction to help balance the stresses that comes with dealing with a spouse that is fighting a serious battle with cancer. He should have found another way of channeling his energies. Rielle couldn’t resist the temptation of having someone of Edwards caliber pay any attention to her and pounced on the opportunity.
I wasn’t there with them, but you can believe that Ms. Hunter lived up to her last name by assuring Edwards she would be discreet, whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted, would be fine for her. I imagine she probably even had the nerve to say that she didn’t have time for a relationship and this arrangement would work to both of their advantage.
I am sure John Edwards rarely gave Rielle a second thought,unless it had to do with sex. But unlike him, this manipulative, lying witch probably longed for Edwards in the wee hours of the night when she was all alone, possibly plotting to get pregnant despite the fact, Edwards was already married with children. This clearly was a desperate attempt to be a part of someone’s life who already had one, at any cost.
As a female, I am pissed that a woman would fuck someone’s husband, and especially without a condom! There needs to be a sisterhood between women that we protect each other, and not try to destroy someone’s home by humiliating ourselves for an orgasm.
There is a fine line men need to walk when they cheat. If you cheat on your spouse more than once with the same woman, that is foolish because most women are emotional, and despite what they develop feelings and might want more. If that happens, an erection isn’t the only thing that may be hard, so please think about that before you unzip your pants!
I appreciate that you are trying to be fair and you do not put the whole burden of responsibility on the male party to the screwup. In addition, I think your theory of the facts how the whole thing happened is a good one. Your comment is somewhat lacking in separation morality from instinct. We, people are animals. Men are particularly so because they are more preoccupied with spreading their genes than women who are more preoccupied with building a nest. Nevertheless, BOTH men and women are trying to spread their genes with the best counterpart they can possibly find. Moreover, women and men alike can be ambitions and try to make their mark in history. This is why I am not terribly struck by Ms. Hunter’s actions, choosing sex without a condom and chasing a married man. Edward was not just a married dude from a bar. He was a fine genetic specimen AND a presidential candidate.
However, I am much more struck by Senator Edward’s actions. Indeed, his stakes were tremendous. Nevertheless, he chose not to use a condom let alone to screw the wrong woman at the wrong time. It can only be explained by (1) Mr. Hunter’s lies about using other contraceptions, (2) Senator being so emotionally moved (nature’s dictate!) that he did not care, (3) him being drunk and therefore not taking care, (4) having so much hubris that he did not give a damn, and/or (5) not believing in sex with condoms (sex in condom = kissing in a gas mask). Whatever the real reason was, it was probably simple and stupid enough not to be typical for a man of Edwards’ statue. But, hey: “there is enough simplicity for every wise man.” Compared to Strauss-Khan, Edward looks quite reasonable! 🙂
In addition, your belief in women’s camaraderie (“not screwing another woman’s man”) is as naive as the men’s belief in their “camaraderie” (“not getting in each other’s way of screwing women”). If you ask me, both notions of camaraderie are self-serving moral constructs of hopeful losers in the relentless competition of individuals for best recipients of their genes.